<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress 2.0.3 &#8220;tuneup&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/05/wordpress-203-tuneup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/05/wordpress-203-tuneup/</link>
	<description>the home of peter chng</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 23:06:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SQL Tutorials</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/05/wordpress-203-tuneup/comment-page-1/#comment-159532</link>
		<dc:creator>SQL Tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/05/wordpress-203-tuneup/#comment-159532</guid>
		<description>You know, the thing about SQL is, that there is virtually nothing that can replace it. 

Does anyone know if a substitute exists for sql? I mean besides MS SQL and Oracle and all that jazz. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, the thing about SQL is, that there is virtually nothing that can replace it. </p>
<p>Does anyone know if a substitute exists for sql? I mean besides MS SQL and Oracle and all that jazz. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

