<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft and Yahoo! team up for IM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/13/microsoft-and-yahoo-team-up-for-im/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/13/microsoft-and-yahoo-team-up-for-im/</link>
	<description>the home of peter chng</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Chng</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/13/microsoft-and-yahoo-team-up-for-im/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Chng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 18:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/13/microsoft-and-yahoo-team-up-for-im/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I think the newest version of Windows Live Messenger adds offline messaging capability, though it's interesting they took this long to implement it when ICQ had it years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the newest version of Windows Live Messenger adds offline messaging capability, though it&#8217;s interesting they took this long to implement it when ICQ had it years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whittaker</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/13/microsoft-and-yahoo-team-up-for-im/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>whittaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 18:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/13/microsoft-and-yahoo-team-up-for-im/#comment-45</guid>
		<description>i've pretty much tried them all...i can remember at one point having aim icq yahoo messenger... then i got msn and just got rid of the other three because msn was so much nicer looking and easier to use.  but i still miss ICQ's leave a msg type feature...like you could msg ppl offline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve pretty much tried them all&#8230;i can remember at one point having aim icq yahoo messenger&#8230; then i got msn and just got rid of the other three because msn was so much nicer looking and easier to use.  but i still miss ICQ&#8217;s leave a msg type feature&#8230;like you could msg ppl offline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Chng</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/13/microsoft-and-yahoo-team-up-for-im/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Chng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/13/microsoft-and-yahoo-team-up-for-im/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Neither do I, but apparently they are the third largest network, behind MSN and AIM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither do I, but apparently they are the third largest network, behind MSN and AIM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whittaker</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/13/microsoft-and-yahoo-team-up-for-im/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>whittaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/13/microsoft-and-yahoo-team-up-for-im/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>lol that's amazing! ...actually i don't know a single person that uses yahoo messenger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol that&#8217;s amazing! &#8230;actually i don&#8217;t know a single person that uses yahoo messenger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
