<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Live Mail: slow, bloated, and not very usable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/</link>
	<description>the home of peter chng</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scoffer</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-133082</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-133082</guid>
		<description>OOPS, Bottom left "Loading.." zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOPS, Bottom left &#8220;Loading..&#8221; zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scoffer</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-133081</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-133081</guid>
		<description>ADS. if they stopped the ads and trackers, it would be faster. I tested it with AdMuncher on, and off. If you block the ads, it just keeps thinking it has to keep loading them and you never get to open your mail. I turned off AdMuncher and it worked reasonably, but my other adware and spyware program detected multiple 127.0.0.1 loops from this site. Nearly as bad as YAHOO the way they sneakily put trackers, loggers and other unscrupulous "BadWare" in a program and tell you it is "Clean".

Anyway. It's been over 15 mins now with ad blocker on and mail screen is still trying to load (that bar on the bottom right).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ADS. if they stopped the ads and trackers, it would be faster. I tested it with AdMuncher on, and off. If you block the ads, it just keeps thinking it has to keep loading them and you never get to open your mail. I turned off AdMuncher and it worked reasonably, but my other adware and spyware program detected multiple 127.0.0.1 loops from this site. Nearly as bad as YAHOO the way they sneakily put trackers, loggers and other unscrupulous &#8220;BadWare&#8221; in a program and tell you it is &#8220;Clean&#8221;.</p>
<p>Anyway. It&#8217;s been over 15 mins now with ad blocker on and mail screen is still trying to load (that bar on the bottom right).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big wank</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-122477</link>
		<dc:creator>big wank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-122477</guid>
		<description>YES IT IS PURE CRAP!!!!
slower than postal mail, i might as well buy a roll of stamps!
WHY do they feel they must constantly change things? hotmail used to work, now this stupid hunk of garbage called windows live mail has made me start searching for something that i can compose &#38; send an email in under 15 minutes!!
it also doesnt work with outlook express!!
who's faster?
who should i switch to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES IT IS PURE CRAP!!!!<br />
slower than postal mail, i might as well buy a roll of stamps!<br />
WHY do they feel they must constantly change things? hotmail used to work, now this stupid hunk of garbage called windows live mail has made me start searching for something that i can compose &amp; send an email in under 15 minutes!!<br />
it also doesnt work with outlook express!!<br />
who&#8217;s faster?<br />
who should i switch to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles King</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-98693</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-98693</guid>
		<description>Sigh of Relief!!

ITS not the CPU!

Believe me I just crawled out from under my desk with a can of Super Duster in my hand. I was actually contemplating buying a new computer, thinking I'd made too many changes to my Old Faithful Compaq Upgrade or something. I thought the CPU was working so hard (100% most of the time) on IExplorer because it was slowly developing a heat problem or something like that.

I just found this site by googling "Windows Live Slow" out of curiosity. I've actually resorted to using an old MSN8 program I keep on my HD for dialup as a backup in case Comcast lets me down again, as it does from time to time. I love that old Hotmail drop down which lets me access all of my mail at one time instead of having to go through page after page. 

SPEED IS WHAT I NEED, when I play Wall Street in real time. I just lost a thousand dollars, (made only 400 instead of 1400) because I was waiting for this damned program to load, so I could check some financial news, so I missed the Bernanke bail-out, for a long while.

BTW before I go, could I still have a CPU problem since my CPU is still going 100% on iexplore as I write? Is that normal? Also, my HD is almost maxed out,so could that cause the CPU to work harder than usual? Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh of Relief!!</p>
<p>ITS not the CPU!</p>
<p>Believe me I just crawled out from under my desk with a can of Super Duster in my hand. I was actually contemplating buying a new computer, thinking I&#8217;d made too many changes to my Old Faithful Compaq Upgrade or something. I thought the CPU was working so hard (100% most of the time) on IExplorer because it was slowly developing a heat problem or something like that.</p>
<p>I just found this site by googling &#8220;Windows Live Slow&#8221; out of curiosity. I&#8217;ve actually resorted to using an old MSN8 program I keep on my HD for dialup as a backup in case Comcast lets me down again, as it does from time to time. I love that old Hotmail drop down which lets me access all of my mail at one time instead of having to go through page after page. </p>
<p>SPEED IS WHAT I NEED, when I play Wall Street in real time. I just lost a thousand dollars, (made only 400 instead of 1400) because I was waiting for this damned program to load, so I could check some financial news, so I missed the Bernanke bail-out, for a long while.</p>
<p>BTW before I go, could I still have a CPU problem since my CPU is still going 100% on iexplore as I write? Is that normal? Also, my HD is almost maxed out,so could that cause the CPU to work harder than usual? Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tenzing sherpa</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-72479</link>
		<dc:creator>tenzing sherpa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-72479</guid>
		<description>I really hate this windows live hotmail...
Its damn slow al though I have 256Kbps connection..even its not letting me to go to my previous changes..I dunno why this live hotmail is necessary...It sucks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hate this windows live hotmail&#8230;<br />
Its damn slow al though I have 256Kbps connection..even its not letting me to go to my previous changes..I dunno why this live hotmail is necessary&#8230;It sucks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-7833</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 20:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-7833</guid>
		<description>I only like that you can click the first mail and shift click the last and select all the email in between.  I have been using live beta just cause its easy to delete junk.  I have experienced the opening a mail when i just wanted to click the box as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only like that you can click the first mail and shift click the last and select all the email in between.  I have been using live beta just cause its easy to delete junk.  I have experienced the opening a mail when i just wanted to click the box as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Chng</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Chng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-784</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip - selecting multiple messages is now easier!  However, while holding CTRL restores "normal" functionality to the checkboxes, I don't think this should have been required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip - selecting multiple messages is now easier!  However, while holding CTRL restores &#8220;normal&#8221; functionality to the checkboxes, I don&#8217;t think this should have been required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alnegator</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-771</link>
		<dc:creator>Alnegator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 10:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-771</guid>
		<description>If you hold ctrl you can select multiple boxes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you hold ctrl you can select multiple boxes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajib Chakraborty</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajib Chakraborty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-313</guid>
		<description>WLM is best among all the webmails if you consider only the look and feel of it. otherwise it's quite slow. Other things I have noticed that if somebody gets a mail with 10-15 small attachments then while forwarding that mail all the attachements arranged in a vertical way on the top of the compose section and there remains no space for futher writing. This is bug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WLM is best among all the webmails if you consider only the look and feel of it. otherwise it&#8217;s quite slow. Other things I have noticed that if somebody gets a mail with 10-15 small attachments then while forwarding that mail all the attachements arranged in a vertical way on the top of the compose section and there remains no space for futher writing. This is bug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Chng</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Chng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 16:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/26/windows-live-mail-slow-bloated-and-not-very-usable/#comment-250</guid>
		<description>The regular version of Windows Live Mail really is too slow and bloated for me - I agree.  You also have a very good point about developers adding "too many" features, resulting in a huge feature set, 99% of which is never really used by the majority because it's not practical.

Whenever I use Windows Live Mail, it's always in "Basic" mode, which is actually usable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The regular version of Windows Live Mail really is too slow and bloated for me - I agree.  You also have a very good point about developers adding &#8220;too many&#8221; features, resulting in a huge feature set, 99% of which is never really used by the majority because it&#8217;s not practical.</p>
<p>Whenever I use Windows Live Mail, it&#8217;s always in &#8220;Basic&#8221; mode, which is actually usable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
