<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment spam evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/31/comment-spam-evolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/31/comment-spam-evolution/</link>
	<description>the home of peter chng</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: unitstep.net</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/31/comment-spam-evolution/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>unitstep.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 15:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/07/31/comment-spam-evolution/#comment-334</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Akismet problems...&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#8217;ve been using Akismet to control comment spam and so far, it&#8217;s performance has been excellent - out of close to 300 comments, it didn&#8217;t report a single false positive and only let through one or two cleverly-crafted comments.  Howev...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Akismet problems&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using Akismet to control comment spam and so far, it&#8217;s performance has been excellent - out of close to 300 comments, it didn&#8217;t report a single false positive and only let through one or two cleverly-crafted comments.  Howev&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
