<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Flash-based websites are bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/08/06/why-flash-based-websites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/08/06/why-flash-based-websites/</link>
	<description>the home of peter chng</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Chng</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/08/06/why-flash-based-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-101399</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Chng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 21:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/08/06/why-flash-based-websites-are-bad/#comment-101399</guid>
		<description>Hey Andy,

I agree 100%.  There's nothing inherently wrong with flash - it's great for websites like YouTube or Google Finance where it plays an important part in delivering content and interaction.  However, using Flash to deliver loads of text or other information that display just fine in HTML is a waste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andy,</p>
<p>I agree 100%.  There&#8217;s nothing inherently wrong with flash - it&#8217;s great for websites like YouTube or Google Finance where it plays an important part in delivering content and interaction.  However, using Flash to deliver loads of text or other information that display just fine in <acronym class="uttInitialism" title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</acronym> is a waste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/08/06/why-flash-based-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-101175</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/08/06/why-flash-based-websites-are-bad/#comment-101175</guid>
		<description>Even though this post is two years old, i couldnt agree more.
 I do not blame the flash programmers for the site, because flash is fun to write, but I blame the people paying them to make a website.
I am in the market for a new vehicle, and out of the 36 different brands websites I visited, only two sites had minimal or no flash. www.lexus.com and www.mercedesbenz.com 
I went to fords website, and the main page took 41 seconds to load on an 800kbs connection. That is simply insane!
I think the only acceptable use of flash, is for gaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though this post is two years old, i couldnt agree more.<br />
 I do not blame the flash programmers for the site, because flash is fun to write, but I blame the people paying them to make a website.<br />
I am in the market for a new vehicle, and out of the 36 different brands websites I visited, only two sites had minimal or no flash. <a href="http://www.lexus.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lexus.com</a> and <a href="http://www.mercedesbenz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mercedesbenz.com</a><br />
I went to fords website, and the main page took 41 seconds to load on an 800kbs connection. That is simply insane!<br />
I think the only acceptable use of flash, is for gaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.S.</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/08/06/why-flash-based-websites/comment-page-1/#comment-52809</link>
		<dc:creator>A.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 13:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/08/06/why-flash-based-websites-are-bad/#comment-52809</guid>
		<description>Aside the poor design. Flash is pretty much a pointless medium when trying to get information from a site. They are flash only websites which could easily be achieved non-flash and unviewable on devices which do not support it. What happened to the old guidelines where websites could be viewable in any browser.... When a site is completely flash-based, no matter how 'flash' it is - it is automatically a poor design because it remains only accessible to people with flash installed. Mobile devices have poor flash support and with this a growing market (mobile internet) surely, more thought should be into sites that have mobile accessibility....I just can't believe that some so-called trained/expert web developers overlook this. Cowboys I say..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside the poor design. Flash is pretty much a pointless medium when trying to get information from a site. They are flash only websites which could easily be achieved non-flash and unviewable on devices which do not support it. What happened to the old guidelines where websites could be viewable in any browser&#8230;. When a site is completely flash-based, no matter how &#8216;flash&#8217; it is - it is automatically a poor design because it remains only accessible to people with flash installed. Mobile devices have poor flash support and with this a growing market (mobile internet) surely, more thought should be into sites that have mobile accessibility&#8230;.I just can&#8217;t believe that some so-called trained/expert web developers overlook this. Cowboys I say..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
