<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going Quad Core</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unitstep.net/blog/2008/01/30/going-quad-core/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2008/01/30/going-quad-core/</link>
	<description>the home of peter chng</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Juan</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2008/01/30/going-quad-core/#comment-99808</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 07:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2008/01/30/going-quad-core/#comment-99808</guid>
		<description>Oh yes, the quad-core will certainly be used in compiling a lot of stuff and encoding in a shorter period of time (I believe). Using the power of 4 individual Core micro-architectured CPU running at 2.4GHz is really useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, the quad-core will certainly be used in compiling a lot of stuff and encoding in a shorter period of time (I believe). Using the power of 4 individual Core micro-architectured CPU running at 2.4GHz is really useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2008/01/30/going-quad-core/#comment-92795</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2008/01/30/going-quad-core/#comment-92795</guid>
		<description>I recently did a very similar upgrade to you, except I chose the E6850 instead of the Q6600.  Part of me regrets that, especially given how many people can overclock their Q6600 up to 3 GHz with no problem.  On the other hand, the only thing that I do that would really benefit would probably be Gentoo compiles, but I can do that in the background while doing other things anyway.  Oblivion, LOTRO, or any of the less intensive games I play would see approximately zero benefit, and I don't do any video encoding or the like.  But still, like you say, quad core is so...cool.  If I just can't take it any more in a few months, I might just sell my E6850 and snag a Q9450 (12 MB cache!) and OC it to 3 GHz or above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently did a very similar upgrade to you, except I chose the E6850 instead of the Q6600.  Part of me regrets that, especially given how many people can overclock their Q6600 up to 3 GHz with no problem.  On the other hand, the only thing that I do that would really benefit would probably be Gentoo compiles, but I can do that in the background while doing other things anyway.  Oblivion, LOTRO, or any of the less intensive games I play would see approximately zero benefit, and I don&#8217;t do any video encoding or the like.  But still, like you say, quad core is so&#8230;cool.  If I just can&#8217;t take it any more in a few months, I might just sell my E6850 and snag a Q9450 (12 MB cache!) and OC it to 3 GHz or above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
