<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>unitstep.net &#187; communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unitstep.net/blog/category/communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unitstep.net</link>
	<description>the home of peter chng</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Subscribe to Comments for E-mail notification of replies</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2008/11/08/subscribe-to-comments-for-e-mail-notification-of-replies/</link>
		<comments>http://unitstep.net/blog/2008/11/08/subscribe-to-comments-for-e-mail-notification-of-replies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Chng</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Colophon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[automattic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[disqus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[intensedebate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/?p=552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to the numerous comments received on my Acer Aspire One 6 vs. 3-cell battery comparison and subsequent full review, (thanks people!) I&#8217;ve added the popular Subscribe to Comments plugin to make dealing with responses easier.

Many of you posted questions in the comments, and having to keep checking back to see if anyone has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to the numerous comments received on my Acer Aspire One <a href="/blog/2008/08/26/acer-aspire-one-6-cell-vs-3-cell-battery-comparison/">6 vs. 3-cell battery comparison</a> and subsequent <a href="/blog/2008/09/09/acer-aspire-one-canadian-review/">full review</a>, (thanks people!) I&#8217;ve added the popular <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/subscribe-to-comments/">Subscribe to Comments</a> plugin to make dealing with responses easier.</p>
<p class="image"><img src="http://unitstep.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/subscribe-comments.jpg" alt="" title="subscribe-comments" /></p>
<p>Many of you posted questions in the comments, and having to keep checking back to see if anyone has posted a reply can be tedious and time-consuming.  Instead, you can now subscribe to a comment thread when you post a reply; any subsequent comments will generate a notification that is e-mailed to you, keeping you up to date.  The e-mail will also contain a link to where you can manage all the threads you are subscribed to and remove yourself from any subscriptions, so you have full control over what e-mails you receive.  So don&#8217;t be afraid to use this feature!</p>
<p><strong>The feature is disabled/unchecked by default until you enable it</strong>.  This means it is purely an <em>opt-in</em> subscription, to prevent connotations of spam, which we all hate.  I have tried it out and it appears to be working, but <a href="/contact">let me know</a> if you have any problems.</p>
<h3>Future changes</h3>
<p>I had considered going with a third-party/centralized fully-featured commenting system like <a href="http://disqus.com/">DISQUS</a> or <a href="http://intensedebate.com/">IntenseDebate</a>, since they offered other nice things such as threading, replying and much more user control over things.  Additionally, the idea of your comments on one blog being part of your overall &#8220;identity&#8221; on the web expands the discussion and appeals to many active participants.  From what I&#8217;ve seen of DISQUS on other sites, it appears to be very appealing.</p>
<p>However, I wasn&#8217;t sure of what direction things would move in after moving to a third-party commenting system, or what would happen to comments stored there.  Recently, <a href="http://ma.tt/2008/09/intense-debate-goes-automattic/">IntenseDebate was acquired by Automattic</a>, the startup behind WordPress.com and the open source <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress project</a>, which of course powers this blog.</p>
<p>Since then, IntenseDebate has become an invite-only service. (if only temporarily)  One would expect tighter integration with WordPress.com and IntenseDebate, but I&#8217;m not sure how this will affect the standalone WordPress with respect to whether IntenseDebate will work &#8220;better&#8221; with it than DISQUS.  I am going to wait a while to see how this all plays out before making a move, but I expect to move to one of these systems in the future</p>
<hr/>Copyright &copy; 2009 <strong><a href="http://unitstep.net">unitstep.net</a></strong>. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact <strong><a href="mailto:webmaster@unitstep.net">webmaster@unitstep.net</a></strong> for more information.<br/><span style="float: right;font-size: 7pt"><a href="http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/wordpress-plugins-provided-by-taraganacom/">Plugin</a> by <a href="http://www.taragana.com/">Taragana</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unitstep.net/blog/2008/11/08/subscribe-to-comments-for-e-mail-notification-of-replies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Constant Partial Attention as Multitasking</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2007/05/10/constant-partial-attention-as-multitasking/</link>
		<comments>http://unitstep.net/blog/2007/05/10/constant-partial-attention-as-multitasking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 17:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Chng</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[cellphones]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[society]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unitstep.net/blog/2007/05/10/constant-partial-attention-as-multitasking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was multitasking the other day across two computers, and it reminded me of a conversation I had with another student one summer ago.  We were talking about the rise of communication devices, such as cellphones, BlackBerrys and the like, and how they are potentially disruptive to productivity, because they interact concurrently with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was multitasking the other day across two computers, and it reminded me of a conversation I had with another student one summer ago.  We were talking about the rise of communication devices, such as cellphones, BlackBerrys and the like, and how they are potentially disruptive to productivity, because they interact concurrently with the daily tasks we must perform.  He gave me an example of a meeting he had attended when working for a big company, where everyone was &#8220;plugged in&#8221;, either using their laptop or PDA, for the entire duration.  No one was really listening to each other, and the only time they stopped using their communication devices was when it was their turn to speak.  </p>
<p>Of course, this is an extreme example, and is not indicative of most situations.  But certainly all of these devices <em>are</em> affecting the way we interact with each other and get work done.  In fact, I think that overuse of these devices and their &#8220;always on, always connected&#8221; nature can lead to something I like to call <dfn>Constant Partial Attention</dfn>.  This is a state where you are alert, but because you are multitasking between so many different jobs, you aren&#8217;t as productive as you could be.  </p>
<h3>Not a technology hater</h3>
<p>Now, don&#8217;t get me wrong - I am not hatin&#8217; on technology.  Far from it, I am a geek at heart, and have spent considerable time learning about all things related to technology.  I will admit that there are definite benefits to having a cellphone or other communication device. (Even though I still don&#8217;t have one) The danger comes from overuse of these devices to the point where they&#8217;re being used for no reason.  This creates the constant partial attention situation.  </p>
<p>For example, at university I have two computers, my desktop PC and my laptop.  The laptop&#8217;s used for work and portability, and the PC for gaming, since it&#8217;s far cheaper to build a desktop gaming rig than buy a gaming laptop.  However, when I&#8217;m at home, I have both of them in front of me, so that I can use either at will.  You might think that this could improve productivity (at least I thought that it would), but in reality it often made me less productive.  The times that I had to use both at the same time were more than offset by the times that I found myself uselessly switching between two computers.  Overall, work is much better accomplished on one computer, rather than two, and that is why I will be switching back to a single desktop now that I&#8217;m <a href="/blog/2007/05/08/schools-out/">done school</a>.</p>
<h3>Multitasking?</h3>
<p>Now, that was somewhat of an extreme example as well, but it does illustrate my point.  Carrying around a BlackBerry or cellphone can be like having that second system always at your side.  Sure, you could say that you&#8217;re just multitasking, but there are studies that claim that <a href="http://www.apa.org/releases/multitasking.html">multitasking</a> can actually be less time-effective.  This has the opposite effect of the expected increase in productivity from multitasking.  I interpret this as the effect of constant partial attention, and I believe that as devices allow us to be more connected, more of the time, this has the potential to increase.   </p>
<hr/>Copyright &copy; 2009 <strong><a href="http://unitstep.net">unitstep.net</a></strong>. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact <strong><a href="mailto:webmaster@unitstep.net">webmaster@unitstep.net</a></strong> for more information.<br/><span style="float: right;font-size: 7pt"><a href="http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/wordpress-plugins-provided-by-taraganacom/">Plugin</a> by <a href="http://www.taragana.com/">Taragana</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unitstep.net/blog/2007/05/10/constant-partial-attention-as-multitasking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
