<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>unitstep.net &#187; tags</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unitstep.net/blog/category/tags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unitstep.net</link>
	<description>the home of peter chng</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 19:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Looking for a good WordPress tagging plugin</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/06/18/looking-for-a-good-wordpress-tagging-plugin/</link>
		<comments>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/06/18/looking-for-a-good-wordpress-tagging-plugin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Chng</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Colophon]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unitstep.net/blog/2006/06/18/looking-for-a-good-wordpress-tagging-plugin/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Since tagging is all the rage nowadays, I&#8217;ve been looking for a good plugin that adds this functionality to WordPress.  Tagging is a nice, quick way to add useful metadata to an entry or post, and besides this basic feature, it allows for other useful features as well.  For example, for an entry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
Since <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tags">tagging</a> is all the rage nowadays, I&#8217;ve been looking for a good plugin that adds this functionality to WordPress.  Tagging is a nice, quick way to add useful metadata to an entry or post, and besides this basic feature, it allows for other useful features as well.  For example, for an entry I could display a list of similar or related entries, based on common tags.  It would also make entries integrated better with <a href="http://www.technorati.com">Technorati</a>.  WordPress doesn&#8217;t currently include a tagging function, instead relying on its old categorization system, but I assume that tags are an upcoming feature, slated to either replace or complement categories.  But there are just a few snags preventing me from fully adopting a tagging system, despite the benefits it would offer.
</p>
<p>
Firstly, there are just <a href="http://wp-plugins.net/">so many tagging plugins</a> out there, that I have a tough time deciding which ones are good, or even which ones have the features I want.  (Or even <em>what</em> features I want!) Reading up on other people&#8217;s personal experiences, while useful, is also very time-consuming, but I&#8217;ve run into a few potential plugins.
</p>
<p>
Firstly, <a href="http://www.neato.co.nz/ultimate-tag-warrior/">Ultimate Tag Warrior</a> seems to be a feature-rich plugin that should have everything I&#8217;d ever need.  Besides tagging support, it also offers support for weighted tag clouds, similar to what you have at <a href="http://del.icio.us">del.icio.us</a>.   But, since it keeps tags separate from categories (not a bad thing), it uses its own table for tag storage, which could create problems when upgrading.  But this is a minor problem, as I&#8217;m sure a writing a script for the upgrade conversion would be trivial.  But, I&#8217;ve also heard some <a href="http://www.darcynorman.net/2006/01/15/dumping-ultimate-tag-warrior-plugin">negativity</a> about it, and from playing around with it for a bit, it seems to have almost <em>too</em> many features for me.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://sw-guide.de/wordpress/category-tagging-plugin/">This category-tagging</a> plugin also looks decent.  In contrast to Ultimate Tag Warrior, it just uses the WordPress categories as tags, and thus shouldn&#8217;t have to rely on any other tables besides WordPress&#8217; own.  This plugin thus probably does the least modification, and this is good since less is often more.  An additional benefit is that no more work would be required in order to display tags, since categories would become tags.  It also includes nice functions such as a weighted tag cloud.  Yet another plugin, <a href="http://www.agkamai.org/cat2tag/">Cat2Tag</a> also seems to provide similar functionality to this one.  These plugins would also probably be the best option in considering future versions of WordPress - I believe it&#8217;s likely that categories will be supplanted by tags in the next major version.
</p>
<p>
But maybe the main reason for my apprehension is my unnatural like of the structure of categories.  You see, tags have become such a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy">big thing</a> because they are easy to use, and natural to most everyone.  But for me, it seems to be the opposite.  Despite not being able to deny the usefulness of tags, I would still like to have categories alongside them.  For me, tags can be <em>too</em> open-ended, but perhaps this is just in the sematics of how tags are used - I suppose tags can be just as structured as categories.   Perhaps a good compromise would be categories for the main subject and tagging for keywords; this would provide a good structure and still have the good metadata of tags.  This would also eliminate the need for a nightmare hierarchy of categories and sub-categories.  (Ultimate Tag Warrior could provide this functionality.)
</p>
<p>
But, maybe I&#8217;ll just have to learn to deal with a tags-only system if and when WordPress switches over to tags.  In the meantime, I&#8217;ll probably be fence-sitting, undecided on what to do, and inevitably, stuck without tags.
</p>
<h3>Update</h3>
<p>I&#8217;ve decided to go with the simple, but effective <a href="http://sw-guide.de/wordpress/category-tagging-plugin/">Category Tagging Plugin</a> for WordPress, since it uses WordPress&#8217; own categories as &#8220;tags&#8221;, and so integrates nicely while at the same time providing much-needed &#8220;Related Posts&#8221; and &#8220;Tag Cloud&#8221; functions.  The fact that it doesn&#8217;t create another table for the tags makes it easy to switch out from using this plugin, should the need arise.  Stay tuned for more details.</p>
<hr/>Copyright &copy; 2009 <strong><a href="http://unitstep.net">unitstep.net</a></strong>. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact <strong><a href="mailto:webmaster@unitstep.net">webmaster@unitstep.net</a></strong> for more information.<br/><span style="float: right;font-size: 7pt"><a href="http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/wordpress-plugins-provided-by-taraganacom/">Plugin</a> by <a href="http://www.taragana.com/">Taragana</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/06/18/looking-for-a-good-wordpress-tagging-plugin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meta-crazy with del.icio.us</title>
		<link>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/05/26/meta-crazy-with-delicious/</link>
		<comments>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/05/26/meta-crazy-with-delicious/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 02:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter Chng</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[delicious]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.unitstep.net/blog/2006/05/26/meta-crazy-with-delicious/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, I&#8217;ve been using del.icio.us for a little while now, and I&#8217;m very impressed.  I don&#8217;t know how I lived without this before, when I was stuck in the dark ages of offline bookmarks and always worrying about how I&#8217;d synchronize my bookmarks between my computers and wondering how I&#8217;d combine them and their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I&#8217;ve been using <a href="http://del.icio.us">del.icio.us</a> for a little while now, and I&#8217;m very impressed.  I don&#8217;t know how I lived without this before, when I was stuck in the dark ages of offline bookmarks and always worrying about how I&#8217;d synchronize my bookmarks between my computers and wondering how I&#8217;d combine them and their many (overlapping) categories.  It was an organizational nightmare, but I put up with it because, well, I&#8217;m a neat freak and like organizing stuff.</p>
<p>Del.icio.us changes all of that.  Being a Google fanboy, I first tried out their <a href="http://www.google.com/bookmarks">bookmarks</a> service, which was functional and tidy but very spartan at the same time.  While it supports multiple tags, a crucial feature in my mind, and has some pretty <a title="Firefox Google Bookmarks Menu" href="https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/2448/">neat browser plugins</a> available, it lacks many of the features that del.icio.us has, such as bundles (will get to that later), and sharing/syndication of your links.  So, after fully switching to del.icio.us and manually transferring the handful of links I&#8217;d accumulated on Google bookmarks, I&#8217;m fully in del.icio.us and loving it.</p>
<p>First of all, adding links is super-easy with the provided browser plugins, and accessing them is just as easy.  Finding links is also a no-brainer, with a search tool easily visible.  But perhaps the feature that really got me was the extensive support for tagging, bundling, and generally metadata stuff.  You see, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metadata">metadata</a> is a huge topic on the Internet because with so much information, it&#8217;s hard to know how to find something unless there is information available about what that something is.</p>
<p>Del.icio.us makes it pretty easy, as each time you add a new bookmark you can tag it with a set of keywords that you define.  You don&#8217;t have to make any categories or folders, as del.icio.us will automatically generate lists for you based on those keywords or &#8220;tags&#8221; that you enter for a bookmark.  Another nice feature is &#8220;bundles&#8221;, which allow you to group together a certain set of tags under a common name, adding more to the organizational frenzy.  Since I love organizing, I was definitely hooked on this.  Furthermore, renaming an entire set of tags is easy and importing from your static set of bookmarks (from a browser like Internet Explorer or Firefox) is available as well.  Kudos to the folks over there for making this service so easy and intuitive to use - a good online service is one thing, but one that has a good interface is another thing all together.</p>
<p>The service also has an extensive social networking component, with the main page displaying a hotlist of frequented links as a sort of &#8220;pulse&#8221; or trend-watch service.   Sharing of bookmarks is also available and is good for bloggers who want to let others know what they&#8217;re reading, as this list can be syndicated or displayed on other sites easily.</p>
<hr/>Copyright &copy; 2009 <strong><a href="http://unitstep.net">unitstep.net</a></strong>. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact <strong><a href="mailto:webmaster@unitstep.net">webmaster@unitstep.net</a></strong> for more information.<br/><span style="float: right;font-size: 7pt"><a href="http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/wordpress-plugins-provided-by-taraganacom/">Plugin</a> by <a href="http://www.taragana.com/">Taragana</a></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://unitstep.net/blog/2006/05/26/meta-crazy-with-delicious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
