{"id":1731,"date":"2016-04-07T18:12:20","date_gmt":"2016-04-07T23:12:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/unitstep.net\/?p=1731"},"modified":"2016-04-07T18:12:37","modified_gmt":"2016-04-07T23:12:37","slug":"analysis-of-the-2011-2015-boston-marathon-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/unitstep.net\/blog\/2016\/04\/07\/analysis-of-the-2011-2015-boston-marathon-results\/","title":{"rendered":"Analysis of the 2011-2015 Boston Marathon results"},"content":{"rendered":"
I recently analyzed the 2011-2015 Boston Marathon results. You can see the results in this GitHub Repo<\/a>, or go straight to the IPython\/Jupyter Notebook<\/a> for the details.<\/p>\n One of the more interesting observations is that with the tighter qualifying standards<\/a> the race is much more competitive. Runners have apparently responded by stepping up their game, or perhaps, the race is now limited to faster runners.<\/p>\n The combination of a -5 minute adjustment across the board combined with the “fastest get in first” rule has created a much more competitive environment. This can be seen by comparing the distribution of finishing times for the M18-39 age group from 2011 (before the changes) to 2015 (the most recent year). (Both years generally were “fast”, as measured the mean and median finishing times)<\/p>\n \n<\/a>\n<\/p>\nBoston’s getting competitive<\/h2>\n