{"id":250,"date":"2007-08-25T20:35:39","date_gmt":"2007-08-26T01:35:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/unitstep.net\/blog\/2007\/08\/25\/windows-vista-living-in-the-shadow-of-xp\/"},"modified":"2007-08-25T20:35:39","modified_gmt":"2007-08-26T01:35:39","slug":"windows-vista-living-in-the-shadow-of-xp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/unitstep.net\/blog\/2007\/08\/25\/windows-vista-living-in-the-shadow-of-xp\/","title":{"rendered":"Windows Vista: Living in the shadow of XP"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/a><\/p>\n It’s been almost seven months since Windows Vista was released<\/a> to retail customers, and so far, sales figures haven’t been that good<\/a>, with an estimate of two years before Visa sales overtake those of XP.<\/p>\n Why all the trouble? With Vista being Microsoft’s first major OS release since XP debuted over five years ago, one would expect that people would be desperate for a change. Turns out, however, Vista doesn’t really offer much more in the way of practicality over XP. Furthermore, performance issues are perhaps the biggest flaw in Vista that is preventing its widespread adoption, despite other claimed reasons<\/a>. For the average person, upgrading to Vista just isn’t worth it – and with the recent problems with WGA servers<\/a>, people may end up having more than just resentment for Vista.<\/p>\n <\/p>\nPerformance<\/h3>\n